HAARP Engineering ‘FRANKENSTORM’ Hurricane Sandy – CAUGHT on SATELLITE and RADAR!!!


Published on Oct 27, 2012 by revmichellehopkins

“Like” if you like. Feel free to subscribe to my channel.
Terminology Definitions in Video Description.

Atmospheric Scientists in aircraft take information from hurricanes for DHS Operation H.A.M.P. (HURRICANE AEROSOL AND MICROPHYSICS PROGRAM). DHS funds it. One of the functions of those planes is deploying aerosols. In 2010 the American Meteorological Society (AMS) presented discussion on how these aerosols were effective at decreasing and increasing the intensity of Hurricane KATRINA under DHS Operation H.A.M.P.

“Singular Polarity” — simply a magnet with 1 pole rather than a north and south pole.

“Perpetual Motion Generator” — using 2 same pole magnetic unit – singular polarities against each other to create force away from each other continuously.

“Contrail vs chemtrail”. (As Congress refers to them.)
Contrails dissipate to invisibility within seconds or minutes of being laid down because they are simply steam from the jet wash.
Chemtrails are mixtures of aerosols that are sprayed in the ionosphere with metals and chemicals such as aluminum and barium in tiny particulates. 1 reason being to create a mirror effect to bounce frequency off of, to pass frequency as far as 1/4 of the globe away. HAARP website explains this process.

“Infrasonic Undulation” Looks like frequency on a spectrograph. If you Google images – spectrograph, you will find pictures of frequency. You’ll see sound waves in consistant patterns obviously man-made, electro-mechanically emitted. Chemtrail (already magneto-dynamic) becomes more dynamic when frequency is added to the mix to undulate (stir up) the system. “Infrasonic Undulation” through chemtrail is ELF waves stirring air deployed aerosols up. Hitting the metals etc… with high powered – low frequency disperses the metals throughout the storm, the moisture in the storm clings to those metals, Object 1 – move the metals, and you move the storm. Object 2 – decreasing and increasing the storm’s intensity. DHS Documented during KATRINA.

Which is why the new cloud name “Undulatus Asperatus.” “Undulated (Stirred Up) Breathing Vapors” Stirred up by TTA frequency. Kind of reminds you of the NAZI’s who insisted to their victims, “Now breath the vapors in deeply!!!” As they were locking them in the ‘showers’ to be gassed to death, doesn’t it! I get the feeling that when they came up with that name, they were laughing at their many victims whom they dub the “sheeple.”

TTA = Tesla Tech Array. HTA — HAARP Type Array.
(They use frequency to manipulate.) There are ground based TTA’s (like HAARP n Arecibo) multi-million watt frequency emitters around the world along with countless Low Orbit SAC (AEHF) Satellites, booster antenna arrays, oceanic echo buoys, military, commercial and privately owned sea going vessels with TTA units (BTW …ever heard of mass ocean animal deaths – burned bodies and the necropsy reports stating cause of death to be “Acustic Trama?”) , in field military and mobile units, are all a part of the SAME Global TTA Network, under the auspices of the UN and NATO and are thereby complicit.

Decency dictates that having this technology we should use it to save lives and property but…UN Agenda 21 – population reduction from 7 Billion to 500 Million. It means the wholesale slaughter of 6.5 Billion people. ‘The great culling’ they call it. Impossible to believe until you do the research as to why. If you step into their economic shoes, you understand their rationale. The PTB n UN want Obama in office. UN is overseeing our election. May need Martial Law to suspend elections.

If our country’s TTA is involved (and with FrankenStorm it is, because UN Treaty requires WE be the nation responsible under the UN “weather weapons” agreement) then our leader is at the helm of our TTA network. Working along side other countries’ TTA’s – this is a semi-global effort.
The reason???
UN Agenda 21 (Population Reduction) and attempt to suspend elections. With no electricty, floods, population displacement, damage etc… state of emergency – possibly even martial law.

We have several methods of changing things like this. 1. Prayer – the most powerful weapon in our arsonal. 2. Knowledge – researching and sharing. 3. Lobbying US and UN law makers to create laws to govern these technologies. 4. Our vote.

Weather Modification of Hurricane Sandy Updates

by hsaive

This NASA MODIS satellite image captured at 15:30 UTC (10:30 EDT) 10/25/2012

Weather modification aerosols appear most obviously over northern edge of H. Sandy , east of Georgia/S. Carolina.  Close scrutiny, however reveals aerosols covering the entire visible area of the storm.

High resolution image reveals significant details of geoengineering aerosol deployment. IMAGE

The bad news is that we are looking at..”a significant, unprecedented event affecting the Northeast” Bryan Norcross, Weather Channel 18:33 EDT


Click to ZOOM

Satellite Data

USA8 Subset – Terra metadata for 2012/299 (10/25/12)

subset: USA8
date: 2012299 (10/25/12)
satellite: Terra

5 minute swath data used for this image:
15:25 UTC
15:30 UTC

hsaive | October 25, 2012 at 6:20 pm | Categories: Chemtrails and Covert Climate Modification | URL: http://wp.me/p2FjTj-sU

Could Hurricane Sandy be Weather Modification at Work? | UN Weather Weapons Treaty

by Truth11.com

Adan Salazar

October 26, 2012

Hurricane Sandy is being described as the “worst storm in 100 years” and will possibly mutate to super-storm status once it combines with a polar air mass over the eastern United States enabling it to cause widespread damage and chaos, but how convenient is the timing of this “natural” event in regards to the election? Is it possible that the storm is a contrived event designed to throw the election for Obama?

Could Hurricane Sandy be Weather Modification at Work? obamaweatherthumb
“Call Biden! Tell him up, down, left, right’s not working!”

The reality of weather modification is no conspiracy theory.

Since before the 50′s, weather modification techniques have existed. In fact, the threat of “weather weapons” was so imminent that the United Nations felt it necessary to draft a treaty ensuring no nation would use this “new means of warfare” against one another. Why would the U.N. draft a treaty if weather modification was just a conspiracy theory?

The 1976 UN Weather Weapons Treaty defined “weather weapons” as follows: “[…] the term “environmental modification techniques” refers to any technique for changing – through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes–the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere andatmosphere, or of outer space.”


UN 1976 Weather Weapon Treaty

UN Weather Weapons Treaty
UNGA RES. 31/72, TIAS 9614CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OFENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES Adopted by Resolution 31/72 of the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1976.The Convention was opened for signature at Geneva on 18 May 1977.TEXT PUBLISHED IN: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, Annex; seeOfficial Records of the General Assembly, Thirty-first Session, Supplement No. 39 (A/31/39),pp. 37-38. International Legal Materials, Vol. XVI, No. 1, January 1977, pp. 88-94 (Engl.);World Armaments and Disarmament, SIPRI Yearbook 1978, London 1978, pp. 392-397(Engl.); Shindler & Toman, eds., “The Laws of Armed Conflicts.”
The States Parties to this Convention,Guided by the interest of consolidating peace, and wishing to contribute to the cause of haltingthe arms race, and of bringing about general and complete disarmament under strict andeffective international control, and of saving mankind from the danger of using new means of warfare,Determined to continue negotiations with a view to achieving effective progress towards further measures in the field of disarmament,Recognizing that scientific and technical advances may open new possibilities with respect tomodification of the environment,Recalling the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment,adopted at Stockholm on 16 June 1972,Realizing that the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes couldimprove the interrelationship of man and nature and contribute to the preservation andimprovement of the environment for the benefit of present and future generations,Recognizing, however, that military or any other hostile use of such techniques could haveeffects extremely harmful to human welfare,Desiring to prohibit effectively military or any other hostile use of environmental modificationtechniques in order to eliminate the dangers to mankind from such use, and affirming their willingness to work towards the achievement of this objective,Desiring also to contribute to the strengthening of trust among nations and to the further improvement of the international situation in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations,Have agreed as follows:
1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostileuse of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effectsas the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.
2. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to assist, encourage or induce anyState, group of States or international organization to engage in activities contrary to theprovisions of paragraph 1 of this article.
As used in article 1, the term “environmental modification techniques” refers to any techniquefor changing – through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes–the dynamics,composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere andatmosphere, or of outer space.
1. The provisions of this Convention shall not hinder the use of environmental modificationtechniques for peaceful purposes and shall be without prejudice to the generally recognizedprinciples and applicable rules of international law concerning such use.
2. The States Parties to this Convention undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participatein, the fullest possible exchange of scientific and technological information on the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes. States Parties in a position to doso shall contribute, alone or together with other States or international organizations, tointernational economic and scientific co-operation in the preservation, improvement andpeaceful utilization of the environment, with due consideration for the needs of the developingareas of the world.
Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to take any measures it considers necessaryin accordance with its constitutional processes to prohibit and prevent any activity in violationof the provisions of the Convention anywhere under its jurisdiction or control
1. The States Parties to this Convention undertake to consult one another and to co-operate insolving any problems which may arise in relation to the objectives of, or in the application of the provisions of, the Convention. Consultation and co-operation pursuant to this article mayalso be undertaken through appropriate international procedures within the framework of theUnited Nations and in accordance with its Charter. These international procedures may includethe services of appropriate international organizations, as well as of a Consultative Committeeof Experts as provided for in paragraph 2 of this article.
2. For the purposes set forth in paragraph 1 of this article, the Depositary shall within onemonth of the receipt of a request from any State Party to this Convention, convene aConsultative Committee of Experts. Any State Party may appoint an expert to the Committeewhose functions and rules of procedure are set out in the annex which constitutes an integralpart of this Convention. The Committee shall transmit to the Depositary a summary of itsfindings of fact, incorporating all views and information presented to the Committee during itsproceedings. The Depositary shall distribute the summary to all States Parties.
3. Any State Party to this Convention which has reason to believe that any other State Party isacting in breach of obligations deriving from the provisions of the Convention may lodge acomplaint with the Security Council of the United Nations. Such a complaint should include allrelevant information as well as all possible evidence supporting ItS validity.4. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to cooperate in carrying out anyinvestigation which the Security Council may initiate, in accordance with the provisions of theCharter of the United Nations, on the basis of the complaint received by the Council. TheSecurity Council shall inform the States Parties of the results of the investigation.5. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes to provide or support assistance, inaccordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, to any State Party whichso requests, if the Security Council decides that such Party has been harmed or is likely to beharmed as a result of violation of the Convention.
1. Any State Party to this Convention may propose amendments to the Convention. The text of any proposed amendment shall be submitted to the Depositary, who shall promptly circulate itto all States Parties.
2. An amendment shall enter into force for all States Parties to this Convention which haveaccepted it, upon the deposit with the Depositary of instruments of acceptance by a majority of States Parties. Thereafter it shall enter into force for any remaining State Party on the date of deposit of its instrument of acceptance.
This Convention shall be of unlimited duration.
1. Five years after the entry into force of this Convention, a conference of the States Parties tothe Convention shall be convened by the Depositary at Geneva, Switzerland. The conferenceshall review the operation of the Convention with a view to ensuring that its purposes andprovisions are being realized, and shall in particular examine the effectiveness of theprovisions of paragraph 1 of article I in eliminating the dangers of military or any other hostileuse of environmental modification techniques.
2. At intervals of not less than five years thereafter, a majority of the States Parties to thisConvention may obtain, by submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depositary, the conveningof a conference with the same objectives.3. If no conference has been convened pursuant to paragraph 2 of this article within ten yearsfollowing the conclusion of a previous conference, the Depositary shall solicit the views of allStates Parties to this Convention concerning the convening of such a conference. If one thirdor ten of the States Parties, whichever number is less, respond affirmatively, the Depositaryshall take immediate steps to convene the conference.
1. This Convention shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign theConvention before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this article mayaccede to it at any time.
2. This Convention shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratificationor accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
3. This Convention shall enter into force upon the deposit of instruments of ratification bytwenty Governments in accordance with paragraph 2 of this article.
4. For those States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited after the entryinto force of this Convention, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification or accession.
5. The Depositary shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of the date of eachsignature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or accession and the date of theentry into force of this Convention and of any amendments thereto, as well as of the receipt of other notices.
6. This Convention shall be registered by the Depositary in accordance with Article 102 of theCharter of the United Nations.
This Convention, of which the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish textsare equally authentic, shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations,who shall send duly certified copies thereof to the Governments of the signatory and accedingStates.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly authorized thereto, have signed thisConventionDone at Geneva, on the 18 day of May 1977
Annex to the ConventionConsultative Committee of Experts
1. The Consultative Committee of Experts shall undertake to make appropriate findings of factand provide expert views relevant to any problem raised pursuant to paragraph 1 of article V of this Convention by the State Party requesting the convening of the Committee.
2. The work of the Consultative Committee of Experts shall be organized in such a way as topermit it to perform the functions set forth in paragraph 1 of this annex. The Committee shalldecide procedural questions relative to the organization of its work, where possible byconsensus, but otherwise by a majority of those present and voting. There shall be no votingon matters of substance.
3. The Depositary or his representative shall serve as the Chairman of the Committee.
4. Each expert may be assisted at meetings by one or more advisers.
5. Each expert shall have the right, through the Chairman, to request from States, and frominternational organizations, such information and assistance as the expert considers desirablefor the accomplishment of the Committee’s work.
Article I of the treaty states that each State Party “undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.”

Article III, however, makes the provision that weather weapons can be used if their applications are deemed “for peaceful purposes.”

Weather modification around the world.

In 2008, China removed the threat of rain during their Olympic opening ceremony in Beijing using 30 airplanes, 4,000 rocket launchers, 7,000 anti-aircraft guns and, according to the LA Times, “a technique that reduces the size of the raindrops, delaying the rain until the clouds move on.”

Earlier this year, we reported on Russia employing a form of weather modification when they used 10 aircraft to stave off clouds for their City Day celebration in Moscow. In 2008, it was reported that a man in Moscow had a chunk of cement fall on his house after it “failed to fragment when falling through the air” during a mission to clear the skies.

In 2005, a proposed U.S. Senate bill would have created a Weather Modification Operations and Research Board to promote further research into the area.

Also, earlier this year we reported on the massive $5 billion dollar price tag put on a program to spray sun-dimming particles into the upper atmosphere, a program put in motion to allegedly halt global warming. The program, known by a few under the moniker “chemtrails,” is widely speculated to already be underway.

For Obama, the possibility of a perfect storm catastrophe would undoubtedly leave thousands
in need of government assistance. Homes and lives would be in shambles and swarms would flock to FEMA for handouts, allowing Obama to grandstand over relief efforts.

Weather modification is a reality and our technological capabilities in the field have most certainly increased exponentially since the 1976 UN treaty. We could possibly be seeing the effects right before our eyes. One just needs to look outside on a clear day and see lines in the sky to realize that weather modification is already a part of our everyday lives.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s